Connect with us

World

Judge hands Trump major legal victory, dismissing classified documents charges | CBC News

Published

on

Judge hands Trump major legal victory, dismissing classified documents charges | CBC News

A U.S. judge on Monday dismissed the criminal case accusing Donald Trump of illegally holding onto classified documents, dealing the former president another major legal victory in what some analysts believed was the most challenging case he was facing among his four criminal indictments.

Florida-based U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, who was nominated by Trump, ruled that Special Counsel Jack Smith, who is leading the prosecution, was unlawfully appointed to his role and did not have the authority to bring the case.

It marked another blockbuster legal victory for Trump, following the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on July 1 that as a former president he enjoyed immunity from prosecution for many of his actions in office. It comes two days after he survived an assassination attempt, and as he prepares to announce his vice-presidential running mate as the presumptive nominee at the Republican convention this week in Milwaukee.

Prosecutors are likely to appeal the ruling, or potentially refile the charges in D.C., where the original request for documents emanated from. Courts in other cases have repeatedly upheld the ability of the U.S. Justice Department to appoint special counsel to handle certain politically sensitive investigations.

In this image from video provided by the U.S. Senate, Aileen M. Cannon speaks remotely during a Senate judiciary committee oversight nomination hearing on July 29, 2020, in Washington. Cannon dismissed the indictment Trump faced in a classified documents case. (U.S. Senate/The Associated Press)

“This ruling flies in the face of about 20 years of institutional precedent, conflicts with rulings issued in both the Mueller investigation and in D.C. with respect to Jack Smith himself,” said Bradley Moss, a lawyer who specializes in national security.

But Cannon’s ruling throws the future of the case, which once posed serious legal peril for Trump, into doubt. Smith is also prosecuting Trump in federal court in Washington over his attempts to overturn the 2020 election, but the former president’s lawyers have not made a similar challenge to the special counsel in that case.

The classified documents investigation was first referred to prosecutors in 2022 after the U.S. National Archives and Records Administration tried for more than a year to retrieve presidential records from Trump.

Trump has been accused of taking thousands of papers containing some of the nation’s most sensitive national security secrets when he left the White House in January 2021 and storing them in a haphazard manner at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida. Reportedly, another document may have been in Trump’s possession at a New Jersey property he owned.

The 37-count indictment included violations of the Espionage Act, which criminalizes unauthorized possession of defence information, and conspiracy to obstruct justice, which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison. The charges included references to dozens of top secret or secret documents.

In a social media post, Trump celebrated what he characterized as a “Lawless Indictment in Florida.”

WATCH l Reaction, investigation and possible political consequences after rally shooting:

Trump assassination attempt: The reaction, investigation and political consequences

Former U.S. president Donald Trump left for the Republican National Convention a day after an assassination attempt at a campaign rally killed a bystander. Meanwhile, President Joe Biden called for unity as investigators searched for the shooter’s motive.

Congress approval needed, Trump lawyers argued

Trump’s lawyers challenged the legal authority for Attorney General Merrick Garland’s 2022 decision to appoint Smith to lead investigations into Trump. They argued the appointment violated the U.S. Constitution because his office was not created by Congress and he was not confirmed by the Senate.

Lawyers in Smith’s office disputed Trump’s claims, arguing there was a well-settled practice of using special counsel to manage politically sensitive investigations.

A bearded man wearing a suit and tie looks into the camera while speaking on a stage.
Special counsel Jack Smith speaks to the media about an indictment of Trump, on Aug. 1, 2023, in Washington, D.C. Smith has been overseeing two cases against Trump after being appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland. (J. Scott Applewhite/The Associated Press)

The ruling is the latest and most consequential in a series of decisions from Cannon favouring Trump’s defence and expressing skepticism about the conduct of prosecutors. The judge previously delayed a trial indefinitely while considering a flurry of Trump’s legal challenges.

In an unusual move, she allowed three outside lawyers, including two who sided with Trump, to argue during a court hearing focused on Trump’s challenge to Smith’s appointment.


Conservative Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas also provided a boost to Trump’s challenge to the special counsel. In an opinion agreeing with the court’s decision to grant Trump broad immunity in the election case, Thomas questioned whether Smith’s appointment was lawful using similar arguments to those made by Trump’s lawyers.

Garland appointed Smith, a public corruption and international war crimes prosecutor, to give investigations into Trump a degree of independence from the Justice Department under President Joe Biden’s administration.

Two others — Trump personal aide Walt Nauta and Mar-a-Lago property manager Carlos De Oliveira — were also charged with obstructing the investigation.

The search of Trump’s property in the summer of 2022 angered Republicans, and one Trump supporter was shot dead three days later after trying to enter an FBI office in Cincinnati.

The case also inspired searches among other high-profile politicians. Biden and former vice-president Mike Pence each returned documents that were located on properties they owned or managed as a result, with no criminal changes resulting.

Trump faces election interference charges in a sprawling racketeering case in Georgia, but legal wrangling over the charges facing the former president and others, as well as the authority of the Fulton County prosecutor overseeing the case, have delayed matters.

Trump was indicted in New York on charges involving falsifying business records related to hush-money payments. He was scheduled to be sentenced last week, but the office prosecuting the case agreed to delay that hearing in the wake of the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling, and it’s now scheduled for Sept. 18.

Trump in his social media post called for the dismissal of all his indictments “as we move forward in Uniting our Nation.” But yet even as he called for unity, he slammed Biden’s administration without evidence for weaponizing the Justice Department against him.

Continue Reading